First a message from our friends at The Oxford Club (sponsor) |
Dear Reader, |
Dr. Mark Skousen here... |
I'm making the boldest prediction of my 45-year career. |
It all centers around one date: March 26, 2026. |
That's when I believe Elon Musk will announce the SpaceX IPO... in what Bloomberg is already calling "the biggest listing of ALL TIME." |
The SpaceX IPO is anticipated to bring a $1.5 TRILLION valuation. |
That would be 3,000 times bigger than Amazon's IPO. |
This is the kind of event that could create countless millionaires. |
But here's the thing... |
Most investors will be locked out. |
They'll have to wait until AFTER the IPO to get in. |
By then, the biggest gains will be gone. |
But I've lined up something special just for my readers... |
I've found a backdoor that lets you grab a pre-IPO stake in SpaceX... BEFORE Elon steps up to that podium! |
And I'm giving away the ticker for free. |
Click here to get my free "SpaceX" ticker now. |
Yours for peace, prosperity, and liberty, AEIOU, |
Dr. Mark Skousen Macroeconomic Strategist, The Oxford Club |
P.S. Studies suggest 95% of profits are made BEFORE a company goes public. March 26th is coming fast. Click here to learn how to get positioned now. |
|
FEATURED ARTICLE |
Insider-Owned Growth: 3 Stocks the Market Keeps Whispering About |
When a growth stock starts trending, most investors do the lazy thing: |
They buy the story. |
But when a growth stock is trending and insiders own a meaningful chunk? |
That's a different animal. |
Because insider ownership is supposed to do one thing: align incentives. |
And in the right setup, that alignment can create an edge: |
|
But here's the cheap-truth: |
Insider ownership is not automatically bullish. |
Sometimes it's alignment. Sometimes it's governance risk. Sometimes it's just illiquidity wearing a nice suit. |
So today we're going to treat this theme the Cheap Investor way: |
growth + insider influence — but with a hard-numbers filter. |
Our three case studies: |
Upstart (UPST) — AI-driven lending with a reset-and-rebuild narrative StubHub (STUB) — newly public, founder-controlled, cash-flow potential with leverage risk Astera Labs (ALAB) — AI infrastructure connectivity with real growth forecasts and premium expectations
|
|
Scoreboard / What Happened |
1) These are "growth" names — with visible forward narratives |
UPST: Management has guided to ~$1.4B in 2026 revenue, above some analyst expectations in recent reporting. ALAB: Analysts tracked by Simply Wall St discussed ~$1.3B 2026 revenue and ~58% growth (based on their compilation of analyst updates). STUB: StubHub's filings/media coverage point to ~$1.8B in 2024 revenue (+30% YoY), but also show profitability is not yet clean and leverage matters.
|
2) The "insider influence" angle is real — and measurable |
UPST: MarketBeat lists insider ownership at ~16.67%. ALAB: Yahoo Finance's roundup lists Astera Labs with ~10.4% insider ownership and ~29% expected earnings growth (per that table). STUB: Barron's notes co-founder/CEO Eric Baker controls ~87.8% of voting stock—that's founder-control on hard mode.
|
3) The market is treating them like "different flavors" of growth risk |
As of the latest tape in this thread: |
UPST ~$29.29 ALAB ~$129.68 STUB ~$9.36
|
Different prices, different expectations, different fragility points. |
|
The Real Reason These Names Are Trending |
This theme is showing up now because the market is quietly rotating toward a very specific type of growth: |
Mechanism #1: Growth is back… but investors want "alignment" |
After a few years of "growth at any price" getting punished, the market has been more willing to pay for growth if it looks durable and disciplined. |
Insider ownership becomes a narrative shortcut: |
|
Sometimes that's true. Sometimes it's just marketing. |
Mechanism #2: Insider ownership changes the downside shape |
Founder control and insider influence often mean: |
fewer "do anything to hit the quarter" decisions more tolerance for long-term investment but also: less accountability if they're wrong
|
So you don't buy "insider ownership." You buy the business + balance sheet + expectation gap—with insider ownership as a modifier. |
Mechanism #3: These three sit in "hot pipes" of the economy |
|
That's why they keep showing up on screens and chatter. |
|
Company/Theme Deep Dive |
1) Upstart (UPST): Growth With Insider Ownership… and Macro Sensitivity |
What it is (plain English) |
Upstart is an AI-driven lending platform. In good times, it looks like a scalable underwriting engine. In tightening cycles, it can look like a levered sentiment gauge. |
The key numbers investors are anchoring to |
|
What the market is really debating |
Not "is AI real?" It's: does credit normalize fast enough for volumes and funding channels to reopen smoothly? |
UPST is the kind of name that can rip on: |
|
But it can also face fast drawdowns if the cycle turns. |
|
2) StubHub (STUB): Founder-Controlled Growth With Balance-Sheet Reality |
What it is (plain English) |
StubHub is a ticketing marketplace. Great businesses in marketplaces can print cash—if they manage take rates, customer acquisition, and leverage. |
The headline growth + insider influence |
Reported ~$1.8B revenue in 2024 (+30%), but profitability has been mixed (losses cited in filings/media coverage). Founder/CEO Eric Baker controls ~87.8% of voting stock, which is about as "insider influence" as it gets. Post-IPO coverage emphasized proceeds being used to pay down debt (a big tell: leverage matters here).
|
Cheap Investor translation |
STUB is not a "nice, steady compounder" yet. |
It's a control + growth + leverage story. |
Founder control can keep the strategy consistent (good), but it also reduces the market's ability to push back (risk). If the business hits turbulence, minority shareholders aren't steering the ship. |
This is one where you want to watch: |
|
|
3) Astera Labs (ALAB): High-Growth AI Infrastructure With Real Forecasts (and High Expectations) |
What it is (plain English) |
Astera Labs sells connectivity solutions used in high-performance compute environments—think of it as part of the "plumbing" that makes modern AI infrastructure work. |
The "growth + insider" datapoints |
A Yahoo Finance piece lists ~10.4% insider ownership and ~29% expected earnings growth for ALAB. Simply Wall St discussed analyst expectations shifting toward ~$1.3B revenue in 2026 and ~58% growth. Another Simply Wall St note highlighted earnings growth expectations around ~28.8% annually (their compilation).
|
Cheap Investor translation |
ALAB is "quality growth" in the sense that it's tied to a structural buildout. |
But the price you pay matters because AI infrastructure names often trade like: |
|
Your job isn't predicting the AI future. Your job is monitoring whether execution keeps up with expectations. |
|
Valuation & "Is It Cheap?" (How to Think About Insider-Owned Growth) |
Here's the trap: when a stock is trending, investors start paying for: |
|
So we use a Cheap Investor test that's built for growth names: |
The Two-Step Cheap Investor Test for Insider-Owned Growth |
Step 1: Is growth visible in the next 12–24 months? |
UPST has a clear 2026 revenue narrative in recent reporting (~$1.4B). ALAB has explicit analyst-driven revenue growth expectations (~$1.3B, ~58% growth). STUB has strong historical revenue scale, but profitability/leverage are the key gating items.
|
Step 2: Is insider control a tailwind or a governance discount? |
Moderate insider ownership can be alignment (UPST, ALAB). Extreme voting control can be a governance discount (STUB).
|
|
Bull / Base / Bear Scenarios |
Upstart (UPST) |
Bull: Credit normalizes + funding improves + volumes return; growth narrative re-anchors on 2026 guidance. Base: Growth returns unevenly; stock chops with macro/rate expectations. Bear: Credit stress rises; liquidity tightens; the "AI underwriting" story can't outrun the cycle. |
StubHub (STUB) |
Bull: Deleveraging + stable take rates + demand for live events stays strong; marketplace cash flow improves. Base: Revenue holds, but competition + leverage keep valuation capped. Bear: Pricing pressure + slowing ticket demand + debt burden = equity volatility. |
Astera Labs (ALAB) |
Bull: AI infrastructure spend stays hot; revenue tracks analyst expectations; earnings growth holds. Base: Growth continues but volatility rises as expectations get "less perfect." Bear: Any hyperscaler digestion cycle or execution hiccup gets punished because expectations are already elevated. |
|
Actionable Plan (No Hype, Just Process) |
You don't need to choose "all in" or "ignore." |
You need a framework. |
1) Pick your lane |
Lane A: Higher conviction / quality growth |
|
Lane B: Higher volatility / macro-dependent |
|
Lane C: Founder-controlled special situation |
|
2) Use a 1/3 – 1/3 – 1/3 scale-in plan |
Starter position only after the stock proves stability (no knife-catching) Add on confirmation (higher lows + constructive earnings reaction) Add only if the key thesis metric confirms:
|
UPST: volume/funding stability aligned with growth outlook STUB: debt paydown / margin direction ALAB: revenue tracking toward the growth path analysts are modeling
|
3) Don't let insider ownership trick you into complacency |
Insiders owning shares doesn't eliminate drawdowns. |
It just changes the odds that management is playing the long game. |
|
Cheap Investor Checklist / Scorecard |
Track these like a bargain hunter tracking price tags: |
Insider ownership level and any meaningful insider selling/buying trends (context matters more than headlines) UPST: progress toward the ~$1.4B 2026 revenue narrative; watch quarterly run-rate and guidance tone ALAB: does execution support the ~$1.3B 2026 revenue trajectory analysts are discussing? STUB: debt reduction after IPO and any change in profitability trend Earnings reaction quality: do these stocks hold gains after reports, or fade quickly? Macro sensitivity check: UPST (rates/credit), ALAB (capex cycles), STUB (consumer spend / event demand) Governance discount risk: extreme voting control can cap valuation even if growth is decent (STUB)
|
|
Bottom Line |
If the market is hunting growth again, insider influence can be a useful filter—but only when it's paired with: |
|
UPST is the high-beta credit-growth lever. STUB is the founder-controlled marketplace with leverage and governance tradeoffs. ALAB is the AI infrastructure growth story with real forecast momentum—but premium expectations. |
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. Always do your own research before making investment decisions. |
|
|
|
|