|
Urgent: The Arctic Is Melting! |
|
|
The arctic ice is melting!... An inconvenient truth for climate alarmists… 🧨 Are you aware of the looming Jan. 28th Ultimatum? Well, that's the one date you MUST have circled on your calendar. Why is Jan. 28 so important to you? Get the crucial details here.
|
Dear Reader, |
Climate is the great fee-fi-fo-fum of the crowd assembled presently at Davos. |
And for cause. |
It is proven beyond all doubt, it is a fact beyond all dispute: |
Earth is down with a mighty fever. Even the polar ice has vanished. |
Reports The Washington Post: |
The Arctic seems to be warming up. Reports all point to a radical change in climatic conditions, and hitherto unheard-of high temperatures in that part of the Earth's surface… The eastern Arctic has steadily gotten warmer, and today the Arctic of that region is not recognizable as the same region of about 50 years ago. |
|
|
Many old landmarks have changed as to be unrecognizable. Where formerly great masses of ice were found, there are now often moraines, accumulations of earth and stones. At many points where glaciers formerly extended far into the sea they have entirely disappeared. |
|
|
Thus the Arctic sweats and sweats: |
Formerly the waters around Spitzbergen [Norway] held an even summer temperature of about 3 degrees Celsius; this year recorded temperatures up to 15 degrees, and last winter the ocean did not freeze over even on the north coast of Spitzbergen. |
|
|
Spitzbergen sits far within the Arctic Circle, incidentally. Imagine an ice-free winter deep within the Arctic Circle — if you can. |
As well imagine a fire-free hell. Yet the facts are the facts. |
To deny the climate emergency is to deny the very nose upon your face… the honesty of politicians… or gravity itself. |
Wait… When? |
Yet what is this? Could it be? |
The article here cited bears the date of Nov. 2… 1922. |
That is correct — Nov. 2, 1922. |
Thus I have played a trick on you. |
The Arctic was iceless in 1922… or at least portions of it. |
Yet the environmental calamity-howlers shriek that today's warning has no precedent. |
It evidently does have precedent. |
Carbon dioxide is of course the great bugaboo of this climactic tale. We are told it is cooking Earth. |
Is it? |
| | SPONSORED: BANYAN HILL | The Elon Musk "Mystery Metal" That Could Break China's Grip | | Trump called America's rare-earth dependence a "national emergency." But one potential breakthrough… quietly engineered by Elon Musk… could end that crisis forever. And one tiny company is sitting at the center of it all. Musk is expected to make an announcement any day now.
» See more about this secret project here. |
| | |
|
Carbon Dioxide |
It cannot be denied, today's carbon dioxide concentrations are far greater than in 1922. |
Yet I ordered my scientific team to investigate the literature. From them I learn: |
Carbon dioxide represents a vanishing 0.04% part of Earth's atmosphere. |
Imagine — if you will — this atmosphere as 100 cases of one-liter bottles. That is, imagine this atmosphere as 2,400 one-liter bottles. |
Of those 100 cases, 99 are not greenhouse gasses whatsoever. They are therefore irrelevant to our inquiry. |
A mere one case of the 100 represents greenhouse gasses. Of the one case that represents greenhouse gasses, merely one bottle of the 24 represents carbon dioxide. |
Of the one bottle that represents this demon molecule, perhaps 50 milliliters represent mankind's annual contribution — roughly one shot glass. |
And so… of our theoretical atmosphere of 2,400 liters, humans contribute perhaps one shot glass of carbon dioxide per year. |
Alternately: Analogize the atmosphere to a 100-story building. The human CO2 concentration rises to the linoleum on the ground floor — no higher. |
Yet this relative trifle is scorching the planet? |
Please submit the authenticated documentation — chapter, verse, line, letter. |
Do not neglect the footnotes. |
Why Didn't Earth Burn Long Ago? |
If Earth's climate was so exquisitely sensitive to minor carbon dioxide rises… why didn't it turn to fire long ago? |
My men inform me this planet has previously endured carbon dioxide levels 25 times or greater than today's. |
Yet the match never struck. |
The catastrophists warn us nonetheless that we will roast if emissions continue — and that they have models in proof thereof. |
Yet do these models give true readings? |
Garbage in, Garbage Out |
Roy W. Spencer is Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. In 2024 he wrote that: |
Warming of the global climate system over the past half-century has averaged 43 percent less than that produced by computerized climate models used to promote changes in energy policy. |
|
|
In the United States during summer, the observed warming is much weaker than that produced by all 36 climate models surveyed… |
|
|
Contrary to media reports and environmental organizations' press releases, global warming offers no justification for carbon-based regulation. |
|
|
Actual warming has averaged 43% less than the junk in/junk out climate models upon which the government relies! |
Can you believe it? |
Further razzing comes by way of geophysicist Mr. Allan MacRae: |
By the end of 2020, the climate doomsters were proved wrong in their scary climate predictions 48 times. At 50-50 odds for each prediction, that is like flipping a coin 48 times and losing every time! The probability of that being mere random stupidity is one in 281 trillion!… |
|
|
The global warming alarmists have a perfect NEGATIVE predictive track record — they have been 100% wrong about every scary climate prediction — so nobody should continue to believe them. |
|
|
Yet Davos Man believes them… despite the perfect record of imperfection. |
Cherry-Picking Evidence? |
Yet if not carbon dioxide, what accounts for the changing climate? |
I do not know. Yet there is the sun to consider — it gives off a varying glow. Might shifting ocean currents explain it… increased submarine volcanic eruptions that spew water vapor into the atmosphere… or shifting wind patterns? |
Again, I do not know. Yet the natural explanation is rarely granted consideration. |
"But aren't cleaner wind and solar energy desirable?" you ask. "Shouldn't we pursue cleaner, more sustainable alternatives?" |
If the world prefers wind over oil, solar over coal, let it have wind and solar over oil and coal, I say — so long as they are adequate to needs. |
Yet the world must evidently come to terms with fundamental physics… |
The Point of Diminishing Returns |
Mr. Mark Mills co-directs Northwestern University's Initiative for Manufacturing Science and Innovation. From whom: |
All sources of energy have limits that can't be exceeded. The maximum rate at which the sun's photons can be converted to electrons is about 33%. Our best solar technology is at 26% efficiency. For wind, the maximum capture is 60%. Our best machines are at 45%. So we're pretty close to wind and solar limits. Despite PR claims about big gains coming, there just aren't any possible. |
|
|
If this fellow is correct — my minions inform me he is — I begin to suspect the wind and solar drummers are taking us for a sleigh ride. |
Wind and solar energy would be vastly inadequate to global energy needs… and would remain inadequate to energy needs through the end of the chapter. |
They may have their place — and let them have their place. Yet that place is evidently limited. |
And what place should the climate catastrophists occupy? |
The answer, in my telling, is the high alpine city of Davos, Switzerland. |
There they should remain. They are not needed elsewhere. |
Brian Maher |
for Freedom Financial News |
P.S. A forgotten piece of financial legislation is about to be reactivated on January 28th — less than a week from today. |
It will make some rich and others poor. |
What happens in this closed-door meeting will not be reported on the news… until it's too late. |
But a small group of Americans could potentially reap a fortune by acting before the critical January 28th deadline. |
Sorry for the ambiguity, but you need to go here to learn all the details. I don't even know if you'll qualify or not. |
But if you do qualify, be sure to get the facts here. |
|
0 التعليقات:
إرسال تعليق